When I look at the candidates who remain on offer in the GOP primaries, I can’t see much hope for freedom. We need a radical for sure, but it cannot be Ron Paul with his blindness on foreign policy and his apparent unawareness of what would happen if Communist China or Russia achieved global political hegemony in the US’s absence.
It has to be someone who will slash and burn government, rebuild the US military into a real war machine, and encourage a return to traditional Conservative values. None of the current candidates would earn my vote in that none of them seem to appreciate the real problem let alone have any working solutions to the US’s current parlous state.
As I have often said before, I think the political battle was lost decades ago. Socialists have white-anted the US and perverted the voting system too completely for there ever to be a democratic solution.
The left have so destroyed our democracy, that if Obama was to offer every voter a “free” pair of Nike’s new Air Jordan basketball shoes, then no matter what damage their other policies might do to liberty, the Democrats would probably win in a landslide.
I’ve been a life time fan of Robert Ringer. The words he has written below are part of an article he wrote arguing for a Ron Paul third party run. I don’t care too much about that. However Ringer does a reasonable job of making an argument for the proposition that a Romney win would really in the end be just another defeat for liberty-
Even if Paul did not win, it would be a Presidential race like no other. And if it resulted in Obama’s re-election, I’m fine with that if it keeps Romney from taking the reins of power and feeding us small doses of socialism day in and day out.
Longtime readers will recall that I took the exact same position in 2008 when it was McCain versus Obama. Early on, I said that I preferred Obama over McCain because his Marxist agenda would finally wake up millions of apathetic Americans. And that’s precisely what happened. In fact, by scaring the hell out of the American electorate, Obama brought the Tea Party into existence.
Unfortunately, the Tea Party has not kept the heat on either Obama or Congress. But if Obama is re-elected, maybe Tea Partiers will be jolted into rising up in earnest — 365 days a year — and will get serious about taking back America.
I agree. The US is too far gone. Romney will make it worse, not fix it. Better they hit the bottom and start the rebuild. The election of Obama will hasten the occurrence of this event. Mit Romney and his socialist appeasement (like John Key) is just a waste of valuable time.
TrueblueNZ 
4 responses to “Would Obama’s Re-election Be Better In The Long Run Than A Romney Win?”
Yes. Absolutely!
LikeLike
The 1% chance remains.
Christie has ruled it out absolutely.
He has problems with the base with his attitude to illegal aliens and the 2nd and he says he endorses Romney.
Endorsing Romney seems tactical, Romney has no positions or many positions, a blancmange requiring no defence.
Neither Christie nor Coulter are stupid.
So take a look at the way he deals with prime cultural Comrades like the Teacher’s Unions…….he took the long handle slasher to them.
This bloke doesn’t suffer fools or ideological correctnesses.
His BS meter is a perfect instrument.
This bloke dealt with the Soprano look alikes for 9 years as DA of New Jersey, he doesn’t look like he’s the type to be run by lobbists.
Three aggressive stump speeches and the base is eating out of his hand.
Romney can get but 25% of the registered Republicans so far, it has been ever thus.
Then I stopped fantasising.
Unwinding Federal power never happens, what Oby does in the next 4 will be set in stone.
LikeLike
What the lady is holding in her hand in the pic above is the way to unwind Federal power. Nothing else will.
LikeLike
I wish you’re wrong this time. Give me anyone but the socialist/communist Kenyan impostor!
LikeLike