A Message To The Progressive Thought Police
People who defend the institution of marriage are not bigots and if Progressives think they will win me to their POV, or weaken my stance on the issue by calling me that, then they have another think coming.
I am utterly sick of the self appointed Progressive Thought Police and their attempts to stigmatize and attack anyone who disagrees with them on this issue.
Advocates for homosexual marriage would have us believe that the issue is about the “rights” and “equality” of homosexuals. This is a propaganda lie.
The reality is that the push to redefine marriage is about demanding public approval and celebration of homosexuality. To accept homosexual behaviour as “normal”
Unfortunately for Whale and David Farrar and Cactus Kate and their queer friends who are all so free with the word “bigot”, I remember the “Hero” parades.
If that is what they call normal then they can keep it.
5 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Drudge Report- Andrew Bolt
- Crusader Rabbit
- The drought bites……‘A western Queensland drover says history will be made when 18,000 cattle are walked from Queensland to New South Wales over the next three months. Nine drovers will move the northern Australian cattle in groups of between 2,000 and 4,000 … Continue reading →
- The drought bites……
- NZ Conservative
- Darwin's Catholic Great-Great-Great Granddaughter Quite a good article in the Catholic Herald today by a direct descendant of Charles Darwin (who first proposed the theory of evolution). His great-great-great granddaughter explains why she is Catholic.‘Are you related to the economist?” People sometimes ask when they see my surname. I explain that, yes, John Maynard Keynes is my great-great-uncle – his brot […]
- Darwin's Catholic Great-Great-Great Granddaughter
- Whale Oil
- Enjoying the simple thingsThe post Enjoying the simple things appeared first on Whale Oil Beef Hooked | Cameron Slater.
- Enjoying the simple things
- coNZervative
- Quote of the Day (Parker)“No one wears a parka as well as Bob Parker.” Don’t forget to vote in the 1-clik The Press online mayoral poll for Christchurch. Christchurch Mayoral Race Poll Filed under: Quote Unquote
- Quote of the Day (Parker)
- The conservative
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Kiwiblog
- HoustonHugh Pavletich e-mailed: The scale and quality of new housing is best illustrated within a large normal housing market such as Houston ( refer … Houston Association of Realtors … latest monthly report ) , where housing cost is at 3.0 times annual household incomes, as the latest Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey illustrates , [...]
- Houston
- No Minister
- Who really cares?The rumours continue that Lianne Dalziel will stand for the Christchurch Mayoralty.The woman who got the arse from a Cabinet role under the Clark administration for being economical with the truth, oh the irony.The woman reportedly seeking to remove party politics from the Council.A trougher with 30 years as a liabour MP. Allegedly unsuccessfully seeking su […]
- Who really cares?
- Oswald Bastable’s Ranting
- Par for the course"Wellington City Council's executive have had to ditch their rose-tinted glasses after a new survey found staff morale was nowhere near as high as expected.Council has come up with a plan to address poor workplace culture in the wake of the survey, in which 81 per cent of staff participated.The workplace survey found that staff were unclear what wa […]
- Par for the course
- Trevor Loudon
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- Keeping Stock
- A subtle message from The Press?It seems as though Liane Dalziel will soon confirm Christchurch's worst-kept secret and announce her candidacy for the job of Mayor. And to encourage her, The Press is running a poll, which presently runs in her favour. But check this out:Why wouldn't you vote for a radiant, beaming Ms Dalziel, against the taciturn, tired and grumpy looking Bob Par […]
- A subtle message from The Press?
- Homepaddock
- Word of the dayArriviste - a new and uncertain arrival; self-seeking person who has recently acquired unaccustomed wealth, social status or success, especially by dubious means and without earning concomitant esteem; person who has recently attained high position or great power but not general acceptance or respect; an upstart; social climber; a bounder. Filed under: langu […]
- Word of the day
-
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" - George Orwell
National Party 2011
Mission Statement
Che Guevara
Just wait till this SSM thing gets in and they start working on hate speech legislation!
We do not need to wait. I got the following from
http://www.mandm.org.nz/2012/08/mandm-on-same-sex-marriage-and-on-being-sneaky.html#comment-161062
This seem to make Louisa Wall’s claim just an other untruth.
56 Offence to deny or impugn validity of lawful marriage
(1) Every person commits an offence against this Act, and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $200, who—
(a) alleges, expressly or by implication, that any persons lawfully married are not truly and sufficiently married;
If a priest or a minister says these two sodomite are not married and the congregation say amen, everyone could be up for a $200. Louisa Wall has lied about this not affecting churches – hardly a surprise.
So am I right in thinking Chuck after reading your comment that if I protest against the immoral behaviour of the homosexual community while attending Church I am liable for a fine from the state?
Low life NZ “progressive” attracts Bolta’s attention.
Always a mistake, that.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/a_cruelty_exceeded_only_by_her_stupidity1/
D4J, the answer is not exactly. However, the following is part of the existing Marriage Act. A priest or minister could charged for the following.
56 Offence to deny or impugn validity of lawful marriage
(1) Every person commits an offence against this Act, and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $200, who—
(a) alleges, expressly or by implication, that any persons lawfully married are not truly and sufficiently married;