The social/ political ascendancy of Marxists throughout the western world has had one real effect and that is an intolerable increase in crime. There are of course a number of other serious downsides to Marxism, but for now I just want to focus on this issue. Like every downside to socialism, its sidelined. Just part of the egg that has to be broken before we cook the omlette of Nirvana.
As Marxists have increased their influence, so amorality has flourished. Indicated by increases in all the categories that would indicate such a collapse- property crime, divorce, broken homes, sexual abuse, rape, violence, indolence, dependency, cruelty, and a general disregard for the personal qualities that allowed citizens to possess self respect. An example- remember how it was once terribly immoral to kick a person knocked to the ground? Now its commonplace.
This deterioration in our social condition is swept under the carpet by the ruling class and their mainstream media lackies. If the reality of this condition was recognised, the true depravity of socialism would be revealed, but of course this is an outcome that must be avoided at all costs.
Why though does socialism produce such outcomes? Because the objective of Marxists is to replace birth parents by the state. The society they see as perfect is one where all children are raised according to the principles that define Marxism, and traditional values are consigned to history. Marxists construct social frameworks that undermine the ability of parents to transmit traditional values and morals to their children, and then fill the resulting vacuum with left wing ideology.
It doesn’t work, as the condition of our society reveals to anyone prepared to look at it with something more than the superficial smirking arrogance of your typical socialist. Family values must be restored. We are in a war. One side wants those values destroyed. The other wants them retained. After the social devastation of the last few decades under the Progressives, it shouldn’t be too difficult for any parent to pick what side they’re on.

2 responses to “The Family Versus Government/ Marxism”
social frameworks that undermine the ability of parents to transmit traditional values and morals to their children
I’m not sure what comes first.
The youth today have so much bling on offer and it comes to them so easily. Values such as restraint are hard for parents to instill whilst all the other kids are being allowed unrestricted freedom to do what they want – drink, party, screw, etc. Eventually parental messages are ignored, are seen as restrictive and ‘kill-joy’, and the kids turn to the utopia of ‘freedom’, of the promise of the state looking after them – student ‘loans’, DPB, unemployment benefits, etc. – with no reciprocative responsibility, with no censure for failure to repay their loans, with no consequences for irresponsible sex (other than a small operation or free money) and no one checking on their work status.
The allure of Marxism is strong, but we as parents have abrogated our responsibilities of raising decent, god-fearing, hard-working, responsible kids by failing to set an example and being too involved in our own lives. We have enabled the State to usurp the family structure and replace it with their control.
LikeLike
The destruction of the family in New Zealand has been a very quick process over the last 25 years,I remember when i was a kid the single mum houshold was spreading very rapidly , once very few of the m8’s and m8esses came from solo mother families and by high school it was becoming the norm that , “i don’t have a Dad”.
Fast forward to the start of the klark regime , and ‘Presto’ , yep bennies for women for anything we can think up and also ‘Feel free to whore yourself”‘ legal prostitution ,now thats womens lib we wanna see.Dad can ruin his marriage by going out whoring in his lunchtime , Mum will grab all the family wealth , kick the dishit out and presto! , end of family , very cunning , but most don’t even realize it.fabian socialist filth klark and co.
LikeLike