Dignified address from a class politician. How small she makes the left appear.
“But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.”
Transcript-
Like millions of Americans I learned of the tragic events in Arizona on Saturday, and my heart broke for the innocent victims. No words can fill the hole left by the death of an innocent, but we do mourn for the victims’ families as we express our sympathy.
I agree with the sentiments shared yesterday at the beautiful Catholic mass held in honor of the victims. The mass will hopefully help begin a healing process for the families touched by this tragedy and for our country.
Our exceptional nation, so vibrant with ideas and the passionate exchange and debate of ideas, is a light to the rest of the world. Congresswoman Giffords and her constituents were exercising their right to exchange ideas that day, to celebrate our Republic’s core values and peacefully assemble to petition our government. It’s inexcusable and incomprehensible why a single evil man took the lives of peaceful citizens that day.
There is a bittersweet irony that the strength of the American spirit shines brightest in times of tragedy. We saw that in Arizona. We saw the tenacity of those clinging to life, the compassion of those who kept the victims alive, and the heroism of those who overpowered a deranged gunman.
Like many, I’ve spent the past few days reflecting on what happened and praying for guidance. After this shocking tragedy, I listened at first puzzled, then with concern, and now with sadness, to the irresponsible statements from people attempting to apportion blame for this terrible event.
President Reagan said, “We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.” Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own. They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election.
The last election was all about taking responsibility for our country’s future. President Obama and I may not agree on everything, but I know he would join me in affirming the health of our democratic process. Two years ago his party was victorious. Last November, the other party won. In both elections the will of the American people was heard, and the peaceful transition of power proved yet again the enduring strength of our Republic.
Vigorous and spirited public debates during elections are among our most cherished traditions. And after the election, we shake hands and get back to work, and often both sides find common ground back in D.C. and elsewhere. If you don’t like a person’s vision for the country, you’re free to debate that vision. If you don’t like their ideas, you’re free to propose better ideas. But, especially within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn. That is reprehensible.
There are those who claim political rhetoric is to blame for the despicable act of this deranged, apparently apolitical criminal. And they claim political debate has somehow gotten more heated just recently. But when was it less heated? Back in those “calm days” when political figures literally settled their differences with dueling pistols? In an ideal world all discourse would be civil and all disagreements cordial. But our Founding Fathers knew they weren’t designing a system for perfect men and women. If men and women were angels, there would be no need for government. Our Founders’ genius was to design a system that helped settle the inevitable conflicts caused by our imperfect passions in civil ways. So, we must condemn violence if our Republic is to endure.
As I said while campaigning for others last March in Arizona during a very heated primary race, “We know violence isn’t the answer. When we ‘take up our arms’, we’re talking about our vote.” Yes, our debates are full of passion, but we settle our political differences respectfully at the ballot box – as we did just two months ago, and as our Republic enables us to do again in the next election, and the next. That’s who we are as Americans and how we were meant to be. Public discourse and debate isn’t a sign of crisis, but of our enduring strength. It is part of why America is exceptional.
No one should be deterred from speaking up and speaking out in peaceful dissent, and we certainly must not be deterred by those who embrace evil and call it good. And we will not be stopped from celebrating the greatness of our country and our foundational freedoms by those who mock its greatness by being intolerant of differing opinion and seeking to muzzle dissent with shrill cries of imagined insults.
Just days before she was shot, Congresswoman Giffords read the First Amendment on the floor of the House. It was a beautiful moment and more than simply “symbolic,” as some claim, to have the Constitution read by our Congress. I am confident she knew that reading our sacred charter of liberty was more than just “symbolic.” But less than a week after Congresswoman Giffords reaffirmed our protected freedoms, another member of Congress announced that he would propose a law that would criminalize speech he found offensive.
It is in the hour when our values are challenged that we must remain resolved to protect those values. Recall how the events of 9-11 challenged our values and we had to fight the tendency to trade our freedoms for perceived security. And so it is today.
Let us honor those precious lives cut short in Tucson by praying for them and their families and by cherishing their memories. Let us pray for the full recovery of the wounded. And let us pray for our country. In times like this we need God’s guidance and the peace He provides. We need strength to not let the random acts of a criminal turn us against ourselves, or weaken our solid foundation, or provide a pretext to stifle debate.
America must be stronger than the evil we saw displayed last week. We are better than the mindless finger-pointing we endured in the wake of the tragedy. We will come out of this stronger and more united in our desire to peacefully engage in the great debates of our time, to respectfully embrace our differences in a positive manner, and to unite in the knowledge that, though our ideas may be different, we must all strive for a better future for our country. May God bless America.
– Sarah Palin

7 responses to “Sarah Palin Statement on Arizona Shootings”
I called a long time friend to talk over the outrageous moves by the Left to make gains out of the Tucson mayhem. In a call I initiated, I could not get a word in edgewise because he only wanted to talk about how great Sarah is. I finally hung up cold. Fanaticism does not serve sound thought.
RB, Your sort of leadership in blogging means more to our side than five Sarah Palins. That’s because Pols are all too slippery. But the dissemination of Truth never grows old.
Palin has importance too, and I’m willing to be convinced that she no longer believes in AGW or encourages globalist thefts like the Law of the Sea Treaty as she did when she was governor. But we need to go on the offensive. The Left once in power will not take prisoners. Look at the message that the radical Left may have sent to Blue Dogs about straying off the Leftoid reservation.
Here’s another wrinkle from history that many remain unaware. What happened in Tucson has too many similarities to the authorities unleashing a hatred-filled simpleton thugs into the Warsaw ghetto and then summarily retaliating against 12 0r 20 ghetto residents when anyone defended themselves against the thug. I see a similar kind of thinking in how the Left was prepped to spring on the news of the mayhem. The Left is trying to hold all the Right responsible no matter how much evidence there is that the Left set up the circumstances. That’s the sort of thinking I’m talking about.
LikeLike
As you said, Red – “Dignified” and all “Class”.
What an excellent paragraph! And didn’t she encapsulate the M.O. of the Left so well, but very diplomatically. Sarah has obviously been reading the same source from which I often quote – in fact she paraphrased part of it, which I emphasised above, and which I have quoted in the last few days:
One thing I wish the likes of S.P. would do is not just say “God bless America” or “we need God’s guidance”, especially when Obama can use the same words and not necessarily mean the Judeo-Christian God, and the MSM automatically translate “Allah” to “God” when quoting [sic] Muslims leaders, etc.
I wish genuine Christian leaders would actually say “Our Heavenly Father”, or better yet “our Lord and Saviour” (or similar). At least then we would know to which ‘God’ they’re referring.
[PS Great comment too, Pascal]
LikeLike
I just heard our local NZ radio commenting on Sarah Palin’s speech. They were putting the boot in every step of the way. It was appalling. They characterized her whole speech as “attacking” the left and were offended by her passing reference to people threatening her. I got the distinct impression that things like the Sarah Palin effigy in a town parade, a display with a gun to her head and the “Kill Sarah Palin” face book page were just fictions made up by the extreme right wing (code for anyone who disagrees with them). Unfortunately for them, a lot of blogs are carrying links to those items as they become yet another “inconvenient truth” of the progressive’s ongoing extreme rhetoric against the Tea Party movement and anything Palin.
It is truly sickening that this infestation of bias is given so much airtime on NZ radio.
LikeLike
Zen, it’s absolutely disgusting the way the Left, primarily the MSM but also other useful idiots, have twisted this entire situation into a 24/7 attack ad. The headline on stuff.co.nz was “Palin’s Blood Libel Outburst”. The article was a continuation of the attack ad. The Herald manages to ignore the Right altogether but carries a headline “Obama tells polarised nation: ‘We can be better’”.
No wonder SWMBO has banned me from the MSM 🙂
LikeLike
I’ve just finished reading a whole lot of opinions by observant Jews who say that her use of the term “blood libel’ is accurate and within the bounds of reasonable discourse.
Then I go to the Brit Telgraph, and their religious affairs editor has a post up titled “seriously, this woman is nuts”. (for using the term)
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100071625/sarah-palin-accuses-her-critics-of-blood-libel-seriously-this-woman-is-nuts/#dsq-content
Truth is an orphan in the media.
LikeLike
“It is truly sickening that this infestation of bias is given so much airtime on NZ radio.”
I agree it is shameful. Amazing to me that such ideological corruption was permitted to grow in a government service that should be bound by political objectivity more than any other service.
Those who should have been busy preventing such blatant politicisation of a public service have obviously been asleep at the wheel.
Those who posture as “right wing” politicians in NZ really just need a good arse kicking and be told to get the hell out of the way. They have all betrayed the “right wing” and prostrated themselves to the left. They are lame, weak, and confused, and we must first rid ourselves of these fakes before we can fully and effectively oppose our real political enemies.
LikeLike
“Then I go to the Brit Telgraph, and their religious affairs editor has a post up titled “seriously, this woman is nuts”. ”
Damian Thompson. Just another dirty cowardly little scumbag communist and propagandist posing as a journalist. They’re everywhere.
LikeLike