The warmists have been losing the battle of ideas for some time. Whereas they’re down on intellectual ammunition, they’re not short of propaganda. Most mainstream media journalists are willing to lie for a cause they perceive as being for the greater good. The United Nations uses its massive influence to spread misinformation and junk science in order to expand its own global power base. Scientific groups depending on the issue for funding are willing to exaggerate the danger. Political groups see it as a means of further looting the citizens, and extending their power. The global warming scam will bring all these things to those who promote it as a certainty.

Those who oppose it have nothing to gain except their freedom, and the knowledge that if they succeed in having the issue sidelined, less of the money they earn will be legislatively stolen from them by scaremongering power seeking politicians.

The logic and intelligent argument is all on the anti side, and the most obvious fact out there in support of this assertion is the pro groups use of the word “denier” to describe those who don’t buy their rubbish. This is a sinister attempt to align the anti group with holocaust deniers, to put them in the same box as those who say Hitler never intended to exterminate European Jews.

This is a cowardly strategy that only really proves one thing and that is that the pro forces know they are lacking a worthy intellectual argument. The irony too is that these people so fond of using the terms are usually some of the first to spring forth with allegations of “offense” and “abuse” if they ever hear the word “faggot” or “nigger” (for example.)

Personally, it doesn’t bother me too much. I’m more offended by the social climate that considers that journeying through life without ever having to be offended is a natural state of affairs. I’m also offended by the abuse of the term “abuse”. This is a word that is far overused and over-reacted to. We are back to that damn cultural Marxism again, once again the same old sinister forces trying to establish a delusional and wishful and impractical state as reality. You will be offended. You may even be abused. That’s life.

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation are a bunch of contemptible communist propagandists that I despise. Their polls are most often biased to the left. As the one below is. Even so, at 46%, that should be enough to signal to those who have made “offensive” the buzzword of the last few decades that they need to back off on using the term “denier”, or once again be recognised as rank hypocrites.

Is the phrase “climate change denier” offensive?

Yes 46%
No 54%

4025 votes counted

Source