A shameful outcome indeed in the case of Andrew Bolt and his criticism of white aboriginals. The issue is made out to be racism, but anyone who knows Andrew Bolt understands there is not a racist bone in his body. Racism is just a smokescreen for the modern mantra that really underpins this grossly uncivilized finding, and that mantra is “you shall not challenge the dictates of the social liberals”.
The essence of social liberalism is that no judgements should ever be made concerning certain identified groups in our society. In general, these groups have a common identifier and that is that they are perceived by the bleeding hearts as being disadvantaged in life by some means beyond their personal control.
There are degrees of disadvantage, and as these degrees increase, so it is considered more blasphemous to criticise them. Probably, the most common identifier is the lack of a white skin (or though paradoxically in Bolt’s case this was not so) but its immensely helpful if you are also not heterosexual, and/ or come from a non Christian European cultural grouping. Capping it all off is gender, leading to the circumstance where if you’re a dark skinned lesbian from Ethiopia with only a smattering of English and you believe your life is governed by the moods of spirit who lives in a stream or up a tree or under a rock, you’re royalty to any social liberal.
Having a strong belief in Gaia or the idea that mankind (meaning all the successful white skinned educated heterosexual civilized males of Christian heritage out there ) is destroying the globe is also immensely helpful.
Bolt made the mistake of expressing scorn for one of the social liberal’s most worshiped groups, pseudo aboriginals who doubled as activists for various causes and who were bent on changing our society in some way. Any cause that diminishes respect for traditional white Christian heritage is fine. The social liberals just adore these people, and will not have them spoken ill of in any way or at any time.
Bolt was put up on Stalinist charges in a kangaroo court and just like Conservatives are hounded off most blogs run by social liberals, so he will pay a price for the crime of breaching the strictly enforced behaviour, speech and thought codes enforced by these modern day jack booted authoritarians.
They have assaulted Andrew Bolt because he does not think like them, because he does not speak like them, and because he does not behave like them. Like most ideas born from Marxism, the social liberal calls himself by a term that is a contradiction. Social liberals are not liberal. They are mostly vicious authoritarians who will use any means possible to silence and control those who disagree with them.
The pseudo-liberal closely resembles the professional communist. He preaches tolerance while practicing intolerance; he condemns bigotry while being a bigot; he purports to be for open debate while silencing all of his opponents; he says he is for religious tolerance while routinely slandering Christians; he purports to be for multiculturalism while viciously attacking the traditional European culture.
They are not liberals, they are authoritarian totalitarians, and Andrew Bolt’s disgraceful and disgusting treatment proves this beyond doubt.
TrueblueNZ 
10 responses to “Andrew Bolt- The Iron Rule of The Social Liberals”
And this occurred in Australia, where there is still some resistance to the social liberal. Imagine had it occurred in New Zealand, were anyone outside the blogs brave enough to say people like part-Scottish Margaret Mutu, almost-entirely-Irish Stephen O’Regan (aka Sir Tipene), Hone Harawira, Pita Sharples and the thousands of others engage in self-selecting their ethnic backgrounds. And they do so to avail themselves of the preference that comes with being a member of that background, to insert their snouts for a lifetime into the trough, removing it only long enough to utter more of the language of the victim which ensures the trough remains full at all times. What would be the result? Exactly the same, and more.
Even Don Brash, who in a very very mild way has had the temerity to say Maori ought not to have special treatment, has been villified by the liberal elite from one end of the country to the other. Imagine had he personalised his attack, and suggested not that it is wrong to (for example) have Maori electoral seats, but that the only reason Pita Sharples had self-selected as a Maori was to avail himself of one of those seats?
LikeLike
Social liberals are not liberal. They are mostly vicious authoritarians who will use any means possible to silence and control those who disagree with them.
Yes.
LikeLike
Redbaiter, what you’re describing is ressentiment: ‘love’ for whatever is the polar opposite of what you hate.
There’s a really good audio book, available for free at http://reformedaudio.org/schlossberg.html that discusses ressentiment in some detail.
LikeLike
One good outcome.
Section 18 c is finished come the Liberal govt 2013.
Because they are a ‘near Labor’ party they lacked the guts to zap it in office, this evil little statute has been sitting around waiting since Keating’s time.
It’s a Statist social engineer’s dream……legislation you’d expect from NZ.
It criminalise “causing offence” so you can silence anyone anytime.
They have picked the wrong bloke to make an example of with Bolta.
It won’t stand.
LikeLike
‘criminalises’
LikeLike
Well said, Red – and spot on as usual.
We all know communists in fact hate freedom; hate Judeo-Christian values, principles and morality; hate Conservatives/Christians; and naturally hate the one true God who under-writes all of the above.
And therefore, as the majority of historical Western culture/society/nations are founded on the above, these communists hate all that has made the West great and prosperous [spiritually and economically], and therefore (as we well know) are doing everything in their power to destroy the West, and people like Bolt who personify, in their minds, all that is wrong with the West.
Conservative blogs are, I’m sure, the next thing on their hit list …
LikeLike
It won’t be long when aussies flood these sites due to censorship.Stupid liberals wasted 12 years by not removing this stupids law when it power in both houses of parliament .Now this disgusting law will stay at least 6 years due to the power of the greens in the senate-come on double disalusionment of parliament.Hey in years to come aussies may flood nz as political refugees fleeing the locals and the tailiban. ps great site to stumble upon -the bolt verdict hopefully will wake people up to whats going on in australia and make a stand against the do gooders in the left .
LikeLike
This is not good.
LikeLike
Errr….no stan…..the Federal Attorney General in a Lib govt can simply decline to prosecute, effectively the statute gets shelved tho it’s still on the books……all the same as ‘sedition’.
it happens in 2013.
LikeLike
Slightly OT…
Same genre…..
LikeLike