By Redbaiter- in the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low.

,

Let’s Be Accurate- It’s Not Protesting, It’s Bolshevism

From somewhere over the last few decades has arisen the mantra that if a government does not allow street protests, then its not a democratic and free government. Liberals have ordained that it is uncivilised to prevent the pubic from gathering in the streets and protesting in a peaceful manner.

Well, I might not agree entirely with that, but for now, I’ll live with it. The problem is that what we are seeing now, with the Occupy Wall Street movement, is in fact far removed from a peaceful street protest where activists for some cause or other march up a main street chanting and holding hands and waving placards, or as the Tea Party has done, holding public meetings in public parks.

By the use of the word “occupy” they make it clear its more than a protest march. What we are seeing is the same old same old violence and potential violence that can be more accurately categorised as Bolshevism. They were communist thugs that took over the Senate in Wisconsin, and the OWS movement is another example of the same Bolshevism.

For those readers fresh from their recent immersion in the Marxist brainwashing device that bears the euphemism “education system”, the Bolsheviks were the vicious and brutal thugs who by means of street violence delivered Russia to the Communists. They were the most militant of the “revolutionaries” and the most focused on class warfare, and they ultimately became the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

My view is that these thugs have long ago used up whatever credit they may have been due from the west’s tolerance for peaceful protests and this was never their intent anyway. They themselves if they were in the place of those now allowing their protests would not do so. They would be in with water cannons and the army and tanks in the wink of an eye and be machine gunning and killing with relish.

Its long past time we stop categorising the Marxist left as peaceful protesters and recognised them as the Bolsheviks they really are. They will use freedom to destroy freedom, and if history has shown us anything, there will be an immense amount of blood shed before we ever get that freedom back.

8 responses to “Let’s Be Accurate- It’s Not Protesting, It’s Bolshevism”

  1. The Gantt Guy Avatar

    “From somewhere over the last few decades has arisen the mantra that if a government does not allow street protests, then its not a democratic and free government. Liberals have ordained that it is uncivilised to prevent the pubic from gathering in the streets and protesting in a peaceful manner.”

    Ann Coulter made a similar point recently.

    Like

  2. Redbaiter Avatar

    The Democratic National Committee called the tea partiers “angry mobs” and “rabid right-wing extremists.” ABC said they were a “mob.” CNN accused them of “rabble rousing.” Harry Reid called them “evil mongers.” Nancy Pelosi said they were “un-American.” CNN’s Anderson Cooper and every single host on MSNBC called the tea partiers a name that referred to an obscure gay sex act.

    Quite a contrast to their sycophantic attitude to the Flea Party.

    Like

  3. Angus Avatar

    Reading what some of those bozos over at Kiwiblog are saying about these protests, they haven’t got a fucken clue as to what they’re dealing with.

    Like

  4. Redbaiter Avatar

    Well, unless its a view that’s propogated by the NZ Herald or the Dominion Post or TV One or TV 3 then you won’t see it on Keywiblog.

    Like

  5. Pascal Avatar

    One big thumb up for your post.

    Like

  6. Redbaiter Avatar

    Thanks Pascal.

    Like

  7. Pascal Avatar

    Some more source material. http://minx.cc/?post=322823

    Like

  8. […] Let’s Be Accurate- It’s Not Protesting, It’s Bolshevism (truebluenz.com) […]

    Like

Navigation