By Redbaiter- in the leftist's lexicon, the lowest of the low.

General Debate 13/02/11

Update on White House Insider. (Latest from Newsflavour blog.)

(See here for previous article.)

Proceed at your own peril.

This brief email was the only response finally received from Insider after multiple attempts to obtain follow up responses to our last communication. I continue to make requests for further clarification. It should be noted that within Insider’s previous response, they made mention of increased activity and concern surrounding the myriad Obama “birther” questions. Following that communication, there followed substantially more chatter even by more mainstream media sources regarding the subject. After some consideration I have decided to publish this message – and continue researching the information surrounding the birth of our current president. As Insider admits in this most recent message – “there is something there.”

Can’t respond much at this time. Too busy with all of the chaos coming at us these days. May be out of work soon! Crazy stuff. Simply urge you to lay off the birther angle at this time. Strongly urge. To proceed is at your own peril. Please take warning seriously. This is not a small town cop shop situation here. Let someone else try and make name on this one.

Don’t blame you as it was me who brought up subject last time. Since then heard repeated rumors/confirmations of attempted “purge” coming down the pike. WH/media going on the offensive bigtime on issue. Has already started as you probably know. Talking very specific, very confrontational, very scary stuff here. Don’t wish to drag you into that. Much bigger fish are circling this. They can survive what could be coming. Not sure about me. Let the big players handle this now. This thing will either break out big or disappear. Apologize for past doubt/ridicule. There is something there. 100% certain of it. God help us.

Respond more in 1-2 weeks. Have much better grasp of situation at that time. Too crazy right now. -Deleted- was as shocking a moment in career. WH and union thugs are kicking our ass and now this. Never seen anything like it. People who thought -deleted- were tough have no idea. This is whole other level. Too old for this. Too dumb for this. Or both.

Give me a few weeks to see how it shakes out.

Source.

5 responses to “General Debate 13/02/11”

  1. Kris K Avatar
    Kris K

    This guy, Insider, is petrified! – and not just for himself.
    Lets hope this issue is clarified soon. I would love to see Obama exposed for the fraud many of us believe him to be. But it certainly sounds as though those who are pushing this issue hard are at serious personal risk. Especially if one accepts the likelihood that Obama made certain individuals ‘disappear’ who knew too much about his homosexual escapades.

    Like

  2. Kris K Avatar
    Kris K

    Another spot on observation by Melanie Phillips on the recent ousting of Egypt’s dictator Hosni Mubarak and the broader implications for the West:

    Has there ever been a society more bent on collective suicide?

    The reaction in Britain and America to the turmoil in Egypt has produced a number of astounding revelations.

    The first is that everyone in the bien-pensant world is now apparently a neo-con. You really do have to rub your eyes at this very hard.

    For the past seven years, western progressives have screamed without remission that George W Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Uncle Tom Neo-Con and all were criminally out to lunch to pretend that democracy could ever come to Iraq through ousting a dictator.

    The neo-con article of faith, that the Arab or Islamic world could or should embrace democracy and human rights, was held up as an example of cultural imperialism, racist bigotry or insanity or all three.

    Yet when the Egyptian protesters called for regime change and free elections, those very same Bush-whackers excitedly hailed this brave new dawn of Islamic freedom.

    They further declared that America had been criminally obtuse in propping up the dictator Hosni Mubarak rather than promoting regime change and helping install democracy on the banks of the Nile.

    What’s the difference? Saddam Hussein was an enemy of the west; Hosni Mubarak is an ally. So progressives claim that getting rid of the former was a crime against humanity, while not getting rid of the latter was a crime against humanity. Got that?

    Here’s the next amazing thing. When the people of Lebanon made their pitch for democracy against the crushing oppression of Hezbollah, western bien-pensants were totally indifferent.

    When the people of Iran made their pitch for democracy against the savage cruelties of the Islamic regime, the bien-pensants were totally indifferent.

    But when the Egyptians took to the streets, the bien-pensants all but wetted themselves with excitement.

    What’s the difference? If the Lebanese and Iranians had succeeded, the west would have been strengthened. But the Egyptian uprising would most likely install another Islamic theocracy — this time under the Muslim Brotherhood — which would further threaten the free world.

    And this is the third strange and most frightening thing of all: the way in which the west has sanitised the Muslim Brothers and even – in the case of the Obama administration – actually pushed them towards power.

    When it wasn’t flip-flopping over whether Mubarak should stay or go, the White House first said it wouldn’t mind if the Muslim Brothers became part of the Egyptian government.

    Then it urged the inclusion of ‘important non-secular actors’ – code for the Muslim Brothers — in a ‘more democratic’ Egypt. And then it was revealed that its proposal for the immediate transfer of power called for the transitional government to include the Brotherhood.

    What madness is this? The Muslim Brothers’ goal is to Islamise the world. They are religious fascists. While certainly there are millions of Muslims around the world who do want to live under democracy, the Brothers are totally against any secular rule at all and stand for an extinction of human rights.

    They are fanatical Jew-haters. In the thirties they were effectively created as a political force by the Nazi Party, with which they formulated a ‘Final Solution’ for Palestine by ridding it of its Jews – an agenda continued today by their offshoot, Hamas.

    Today, they are no less the mortal enemies of the free world. Their leaders have declared war on America, gloating that the US is ‘experiencing the beginning of its end and is heading towards its demise’, and that ‘resistance is the only solution’.

    They support al Qaeda terrorism ‘against the Americans and the Zionists.’ They have declared that once Mubarak steps down they will dissolve the peace treaty with Israel.

    They murdered Egyptian President Sadat who made peace with Israel, support Hezbollah, make overtures to Iran, and openly employ a strategy of simulating moderation to gain power though democratic means in order to destroy democracy.

    If Egypt is taken over by the Brotherhood, Jordan will be next – and both will turn into Iran/Gaza in a matter of a few years. Oh – and they are also busy Islamising Britain and America.

    Yet on both sides of the pond, significant elements of the political and defence establishment have decided that the Muslim Brothers are basically peace-loving, sensible, pragmatic chaps who are useful allies against the men of violence.

    Has there ever been a society more bent on collective suicide?

    Like

  3. Kris K Avatar
    Kris K

    NASA to push the US further into Dhimmitude:

    NASA To Honor Dead Egyptian Bimbo, Not Once Did NASA Honor One 9/11 Victim!

    What is with this government? Every day there is another slur on American Culture, American Values. This time the agency is NASA. Instead of naming a new rocket after an American Hero or a victim of the 9/11 attacks, they have decided to name the rocket after an Egyptian […] Woman killed in the riots.

    The United States space agency NASA has okayed the naming of one of its spaceships after a young Egyptian woman killed in late January during an anti-goverment protest, according to Egyptian daily Al-Masry-al-Youm.

    The paper quoted Essam Mohamed Haji, a young researcher at NASA as saying on Thursday he had received approval to put the young woman Sally Zahran’s name on a spaceship heading for Mars.

    Zahran, a 23 English graduated and translator died after she was beaten about the head on 28 January with a truncheons during clashes with security forces in in the Upper Egyptian governorate of Sohag. Anti-government protesters claim her killers were thugs in the pay of police.
    […]

    How nice. We are learning to be Dhimmis very fast. Next it will be like Great Britain with Halal only meats sold in stores, blasphemy laws stifling free speech against Islam, then forced conversions.

    Here is a strange idea for NASA. How about these men and women to name the rocket for:

    Apollo 1 crew
    Space Shuttle Challenger crew
    Space Shuttle Columbia crew

    If NASA wants to honor a foreign hero they could honor Ilan Ramon (Israel) who died on the Columbia.

    Or NASA could honor the 2,998 victims of 9/11. They could put all the names in a box and pull out one.
    […]

    NASA is funded only by the American Taxpayer. It should be the American Taxpayer who has the final say on the naming of our spacecrafts.

    Hat tip: Holger Awakens

    Like

  4. Jeremy Harris Avatar
    Jeremy Harris

    Didn’t Gibbs quit the other day..?

    Maybe he isn’t a good enough liar…

    Like

  5. Redbaiter Avatar
    Redbaiter

    Yeah Gibbs has quit. The new guy is just as bad.

    Re the Honouring of the Egyptian- remember that guy taking over at NASA who said he wanted to do more to recognise Islam’s contribution to space flight? (or something).

    Like

Navigation