General Debate 23/02/11

Item 1

A funny comment I happened upon somewhere on the net, wherein the author was arguing with a liberal who wanted to increase taxes to reduce the deficit-

Barak Obama’s federal budget for the next year is 3.4 trillion dollars. Bill Gates, richest American, is worth about 50 billion. If you confiscated all of Gate’s money, stocks and bonds, real estate, furniture, shirts, pants, shoes and socks and put him out in the street in his underwear, what would you have?

Enough money to run the federal government for a big fat friggin’ 5 days. Do the same to number two, Warren Buffett and you get another four days. And the FedGuv will still be about 14 TRILLION dollars in debt.

Even if you stole everything they have, there aren’t enough “rich” people with enough wealth to keep your good ship lolly pop fantasy afloat.

Item 2

Why was this guy ever let off the plane, (look him up, his reputation stinks) and if he ever turns up here again, could someone jail the little race baiting communist propagandist for fraud?

A United Nations report has highlighted what it says is the “extreme disadvantage” of Maori in comparison to the rest of the country. The report was tabled in the General Assembly by the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya. In a mixed review, however, he hails the “significant strides” taken to advance the rights of Maori in recent years.

“The Special Rapporteur cannot help but note the extreme disadvantage in the social and economic conditions of Maori people in comparison to the rest of New Zealand society,” the UN report says. “This disadvantage, which manifests itself across a range of indicators, including education, health, and income, is certainly detrimental to Maori people’s ability to act in partnership with the Crown, as contemplated under the Treaty of Waitangi.

“The Special Rapporteur notes that this disadvantage especially manifests itself among Maori people living in urban areas.” Anaya notes that “regrettably” New Zealand continues to incarcerate Maori at a high rate. He said Maori made up 51 per cent of the prison population despite making up only 15 per cent of the total population.

“In addition to the negative impacts on individual incarcerated individuals and their families, high incarceration rates have a potentially significant impact on Maori political participation, as the New Zealand electoral law specifies that citizens who have been sentenced and imprisoned lose their voting rights,” the report says.


16 thoughts on “General Debate 23/02/11

  1. You just have to roll your eyes when “experts” advocate for people not to be put in prison no matter what they do because of their race…

    What percentage of the population actually agrees..? 5%, 10%..? Do they really think that’ll ever be the majority’s opinion..?


  2. May I ask the question, why is nobody addressing Hone’s ma’s plans to upset the world cup with wailing and weeping and gnashing of teeth over poor maori’s mistreatment by the honkey’s? (I notice she is an avid user of pakeha hair dye, false nails and titanium spectacles) another f***ing racist hypocrite.


  3. The dirtbag deserves all he gets. Why? Was someone saying it was unfair??

    Hell, I would ban about 50% of the useless pricks commenting there at the moment. Its like the Trade Me Boards. All those low IQ fuckwits from Panda Sports would be the first to go.


  4. “May I ask the question, why is nobody is addressing Hone’s ma’s plans to upset the world cup with wailing and weeping and gnashing of teeth over poor maori’s mistreatment by the honkey’s? ”

    What is the plan exactly? Gotta link?


  5. Dirty Rat thought he (Ure) was being hard done by and that even you would back him up on this…

    It all started at 12:51 yesterday.


  6. Its Farrar’s blog. He’s hardly ever consistent in demerits points. Depends who goes whining to him. I know that yellow POS Big Bruv complained about me calling him something (can’t remember what but it wouldn’t have been that bad) and got me demerits. You just have to take it or leave it. I just don’t go there too much now, there are too many commie fuckwits with their same old clapped out strawmen arguments all the time to have any kind of a debate.


  7. The past decade has seen the coalescence of a new ideology that envisions social movements in a cataclysmic struggle against global capitalist Empire. Controlled by U.S. militarism and multinational corporations, in cahoots with Zionism, Empire contaminates environments and destroys cultures. Its defeat will bring about a new era of social justice and sustainable development, in which the diverse cultures harmoniously share the earth. Is this a totalitarian ideology? From fascist and communist precedents, we learn that lovers of renewed humanity are not sufficiently motivated by abstract ideals. They must also identify humanity’s enemy, the cause of all suffering. Equipped with a scapegoat, diverse communities can achieve solidarity through shared execration.

    The left dehumanises us because we point out that the above is crap, that there are no free fluffy ponies at the bottom of the garden – we’re the scapegoat…


  8. “The left dehumanises us because we point out that the above is crap,”

    Exactly, their strawman arguments that they will never let go of because they are part of their psyche.


  9. “…there are no free fluffy ponies at the bottom of the garden …”

    But but but how else did the Money Pixies get there if they didn’t ride the free fluffy ponies?


  10. They hate us because we destroy their strawman, but also because we call them on their hijacking of language to make their unpalatable ideology, palatable. We point out that their vile ideology took 150 million souls last century (regardless of whether they accept it was, in fact, *their* ideology).


Comments are closed.