Part of Newsflavor blog interview with “White House Insider”.
So you think President Obama should be impeached?
Impeached? -Expletive- no. That’s too good for him. President Obama should be arrested. What’s that word you used a while back – sedition? Well there you go – that pretty much sums up this whole stinking cesspool of a White House right there. Look, I was suspicious of this guy before – but based on what I was told these past few months…the man, those around him (pauses) …this president is the most corrupt thing to have sat in the White House in our lifetimes. Being part of that campaign in 2008…it makes me sick. Do you understand what I’m saying? Sick. To have played any part in getting him elected…Obama isn’t just incompetent…he’s something else. Something worse. I’ve been around a lot of asshole-arrogant politicians. Plenty of those. Even a few outright criminals. This is different. This is a whole other level of corrupt.
5 thoughts on “General Debate 20/03/11”
I see Deborah Coddington has another disgusting attack-piece on ACT in the Herald online (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/deborah-coddington/news/article.cfm?a_id=271&objectid=10713657).
Worse than the editorial itself are the uninformed, ridiculous comments from the chattering classes. They don’t seem to realise that without ACT (or a new party) National will be left unfettered to play with their brown mistress. Even with ACT operating as a brake on National’s proclivities New Zealand has bastard children such as the ETS and the (about to be born) Marine & Coastal Area Bill. Imagine how bad it would be if National actually needed the Maori Party!
I am coming to believe New Zealand is a lost cause, and the sooner they go completely broke (or the civil war breaks out) the better. Easier for true and patriotic kiwis to rebuild our country from the ashes of socialist destruction, than to battle day-in and day-out with uneducated sheeple who can only rouse themselves from their welfare-induced coma when they see a possibility of someone taking away their ‘entitlements’ to Other People’s Money!
I think the term he is searching for is “evil incarnate”.
“I see Deborah Coddington has another disgusting attack-piece on ACT in the Herald online”
Yes, I see she’s using that mindless phrase against David Garret that “he stole a dead baby’s identity”. What a complete mush head. I can’t believe the Herald pay for such worthless crap. And to think she was once a member of parliament. God help us.
Every thinking person knows Garrett did not ‘steal a dead baby’s identity’, for such a thing is not possible. Pity there are so few thinking people around, and it seems none of them read the Herald!
As for Coddington, I suspect it’s the old story of ‘a woman scorned’.
Yes, one can certainly detect an emotional component to her writing that has that at its base. I wonder who it was that hurt her so badly.
Comments are closed.