A big part of the leftist control of the media is their failure by design to inform us fully on certain issues. In particular they never tell us who the people behind certain moves are, or often deliberately present them as what they are not.

For example, a live TV connect might have a concerned citizen voicing some protest and that citizen is presented as politically non-partisan and making an apolitical point, when in fact they’re often a hard core leftist striving to achieve an objective or agenda they’ve been working on for decades. Or for more obvious examples, they have never failed to hide who is behind most street protests. Its almost always some shadowy socialist group but the media will never tell you this. The media will not tell us that truth. They hide it.

A recent example is the move to obtain some poorly defined concept like “net neutrality”. I could never actually get what was behind this plan, but had deep suspicions. Whatever the left embrace, you can be sure it means greater government control and less freedom, although they frequently claim the opposite as their motivation. That’s because they’re always pathological liars.

Tom Fitton, a writer with Andrew Breitbart’s Big Government blog exposes the forces behind the net neutrality movement. Gives us the information the media communists will not. Here’s a relevant part of his article-

Allow me to introduce you to the people who seem to be running the FCC’s Internet policies:

Robert McChesny, former editor of the socialist magazine Monthly Review, is the co-founder and president of Free Press. Kim Gandy, the Chairman of the Free Press Board of Directors, served as the President of the leftist National Organization for Women from 2001-2009. Craig Aaron, Free Press’s President and CEO, formerly worked as managing editor of the socialist tabloid In These Times. Free Press is financially supported by George Soros’ Open Society Institute and other hard-left groups such as the Ford Foundation and Democracy Alliance.

Two socialists, a radical feminist, and a left-wing eccentric billionaire who uses his wealth to drive the liberal agenda — that’s quite a team.

The “net neutrality” debate is highly technical and somewhat confusing. Proponents of net neutrality count on this confusion to hoodwink people into accepting their agenda. But here’s why many see “net neutrality” as so dangerous.

Proponents of net neutrality, like Free Press, believe Internet access is a civil right. And what happens when you make something a civil right? You put the government in charge of “protecting” those rights. In the case of net neutrality, proponents want taxpayer-funded online access for everyone, most especially communities they deem “underserved.” This, of course, would require government control.

If allowed to move forward, the Left’s version of “net neutrality” could stifle innovation by preventing Internet service providers from managing their information networks with any flexibility. And it could effectively kill the digital economy. As Reason Magazine’s Steven Titch argued, if net neutrality were in play several years ago, there would be no iPhone, to give just one example.

So here’s the question you need to ask yourself. Do you want George Soros and Barack Obama to be able to micromanage the Internet?

The mainstream media is an evil left wing force used by the socialists to further their extreme agenda at every opportunity. The only people who think it is right wing are the leftists on the extreme edge of that side of the political spectrum. There’s not a person reading this article that does not know that the media elected Barak Obama, the most far left President in US history, and that they will do all they can to stop Sarah Palin, because she is a traditional Conservative.

The only thing between the communist mainstream media and their propaganda is the web. Its no wonder that they and their comrades are doing all they can to control it.