Why it needs to be anyone but Romney

If Romney had half the balls of Maria Conchita Alonso (see post below) he might be worth a vote. Check out this transcript from the O’Reilly show that demonstrates quite clearly that Romney is just another liberal suckhole. A no-fight loser of the kind that has been selling the Republican Party and the United States of America down the tube for fifty years.

Gutless brainwashed libs who have done nothing but surrender ground time and time and time again. (as the same kind have done here in NZ).

O’Reilly: Is he [Obama] a socialist?

Romney: You know, I prefer to use the term that he’s just over his head.

O’Reilly: Yeah, but you got to look at his economic plan. An economic plan that’s top down, federal leadership, getting us out of the recession— he spent trillions of dollars on that. And people say, Listen, the guy’s a socialist — it’s class warfare that’s what he’s gonna wage against you if you get the nomination: You’re a rich guy, you’re out of touch. Is he a socialist?

Romney: Uh, you know, I consider him a big-government liberal Democrat. I think as you look at his policies, you conclude that he thinks Europe got it right and we got it wrong. I think Europe got it wrong. I think Europe is not working in Europe. And I’ll battle him on that day in and day out. But I’m probably not going to be calling him names so much as calling him a failure.

In fact socialist is only going half way. Obama should be called a communist, as there is a truckload of evidence to support it.

No Romney no way.

Better another term of Obama than this compromiser and surrender monkey.

Lets get the whole damn Marxist thing over and done with once and for all.

17 thoughts on “Why it needs to be anyone but Romney

  1. The correct answer to the question would be:

    “No he isn’t a Socialist, as you understand the term. He is, as Maria Conchita Alonso said to Sean Penn recently, a Communist arsehole.”

    Anything less is surrendering the language to the Left. Which, as you say Red, the GOP has been doing for half a century.

    Like

  2. ..and I saw that hopeless little freak Ron Paul on the Tonight Show a while ago stabbing Michelle Bachmann in the back with lies.

    Not only does he have to smear her, but he does so in the den of the liberals and progressives..!!!

    I thought that was pretty piss poor of Ron Paul.

    (just as a I thought Bachmann smearing Herman Cain with the 666 remark was in poor taste.)

    Like

  3. Yes but isn’t it usual for the potential nominees to behave like schoolyard brats wrestling for the upper hand? I thought that was the normal process (which is why I thought it very strange that Team Clinton caved so quickly and comprehensively to the Kenyan last time around)?

    Not trying to be a smart-arse, just genuinely curious.

    Like

  4. “A no-fight loser of the kind that has been selling the Republican Party and the United States of America down the tube for fifty years.”
    Which is exactly why the RNC and the media are right behind him.

    Like

  5. Marxist?

    Hah! If he were just a Marxist it wouldn’t be soo bad.

    In fact, he’s not even a Leninist, he’s a full-blown Stalinist.

    Obama should be called a communist

    and a traitor.

    Better another term of Obama than this compromiser and surrender monkey

    Not really, no. The US still has nukes and the world’s biggest and most powerful military – give Osama bin Kenya another four years and it will have neither

    But I’m probably not going to be calling him names

    There is of course, as Mao said, only one way to deal with communists. Only one. And it doesn’t involve calling names, or indeed saying anything. Nor does it involve voting, or the courts.

    Time to take the second

    Like

  6. Lincoln’s best General by a mile was a drunk called Sherman.

    Newt’s past is well known, Mark Steyn doesn’t approve…….but Newt’s best mateys are steel conservatives…..show me your friends and I’ll tell you your future.

    But here’s The Choice ……Oby, Romney, Newt.
    Steyn’s rarely wrong, but he is this time…….Newt every time in that lot, thanks.

    A must watch from Rush re Newt:

    http://www.therightscoop.com/rush-reads-thomas-sowell-column-on-newt-gingrich/

    Like

  7. And Newt is by a nautical mile the smartest bloke in the room…….

    The ex community organiser and affirmative action President, Oby, as Editor of the Harvard Law Review has a unique distinction. He is the only Editor to have never had any of his own contributions published in the Review.

    Newt will cut him to ribbons in a series of debates not moderated by NPR or MSNBC.
    You’ll know Oby knows he’s been sliced and diced in the debates when he starts to appeal for sympathy on the base of his race.

    Romney would be Oby’s soulmate in any debate…..a Super Sized McCain.

    Like

  8. I’ve got no dog in this fight and if I did it wouldn’t be Romney, more like Perry but he’s faded.
    However, gracing Obama with anything coherent as socialism is a mistake. He is the product of a self absorbed, obnoxious and sanctimonious clique whose philosophy is “I am, therefore I am owed” Any vehicle that can get him to where he wants will suit his purpose. Any mentor that can write his ‘biography’ get him on the right committee, the right appointment or nomination will find himself under the bus once his usefulness has been served. Socialist?–if it suits; muslim? –if its useful. Without a clue? — all the time!

    Like

  9. The point is – who can BEAT obama? WHo can win general election. Romney is the only hope for the GOP. He is teflonic enough to weather the shit storm coming from the Obama machine. He reminds me of Bush the elder in temperament. I’m not a fan of Romney. But the point here is to remove Obama.

    Like

  10. There is no guarantee that Romney will win. And if he does, so what? More of the same old left wing crap we got from George Bush.

    Better to let Obama win, and the country bottom out and find again its true political foundation, by whatever means is necessary.

    The United States cannot go on with its society in ruins. There has to be a rebuild.

    The Communists have to be defeated, and with the judiciary and government and electoral system utterly corrupted, it probably won’t happen at the ballot box.

    Romney is just a waste of time.

    Ever thought that he may have been selected by the left?

    Ever thought that the Republican Party may have been infiltrated?

    Things must change, but Romney is just more of the same. If you want the left to go on winning, he’s your man.

    I repeat, elect Romney and you’re only wasting what little time is left.

    Like

  11. “Things must change, but Romney is just more of the same. If you want the left to go on winning, he’s your man.”
    And that says all that needs to be said about the smooth suited RINO.

    Like

  12. ‘Better to let Obama win, and the country bottom out and find again its true political foundation, by whatever means is necessary.’

    Ridiculous logic.

    Like

  13. “Or is a drive-by snipe the best you can do?”

    Well, he’s a leftist ain’t he?

    A political position that right from the start demands you throw logic out the window.

    Like

Comments are closed.