People who defend the institution of marriage are not bigots and if Progressives think they will win me to their POV, or weaken my stance on the issue by calling me that, then they have another think coming.
I am utterly sick of the self appointed Progressive Thought Police and their attempts to stigmatize and attack anyone who disagrees with them on this issue.
Advocates for homosexual marriage would have us believe that the issue is about the “rights” and “equality” of homosexuals. This is a propaganda lie.
The reality is that the push to redefine marriage is about demanding public approval and celebration of homosexuality. To accept homosexual behaviour as “normal”
Unfortunately for Whale and David Farrar and Cactus Kate and their queer friends who are all so free with the word “bigot”, I remember the “Hero” parades.
If that is what they call normal then they can keep it.
TrueblueNZ 
5 responses to “A Message To The Progressive Thought Police”
Just wait till this SSM thing gets in and they start working on hate speech legislation!
LikeLike
We do not need to wait. I got the following from
http://www.mandm.org.nz/2012/08/mandm-on-same-sex-marriage-and-on-being-sneaky.html#comment-161062
This seem to make Louisa Wall’s claim just an other untruth.
56 Offence to deny or impugn validity of lawful marriage
(1) Every person commits an offence against this Act, and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $200, who—
(a) alleges, expressly or by implication, that any persons lawfully married are not truly and sufficiently married;
If a priest or a minister says these two sodomite are not married and the congregation say amen, everyone could be up for a $200. Louisa Wall has lied about this not affecting churches – hardly a surprise.
LikeLike
So am I right in thinking Chuck after reading your comment that if I protest against the immoral behaviour of the homosexual community while attending Church I am liable for a fine from the state?
LikeLike
Low life NZ “progressive” attracts Bolta’s attention.
Always a mistake, that.
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/a_cruelty_exceeded_only_by_her_stupidity1/
LikeLike
D4J, the answer is not exactly. However, the following is part of the existing Marriage Act. A priest or minister could charged for the following.
56 Offence to deny or impugn validity of lawful marriage
(1) Every person commits an offence against this Act, and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding $200, who—
(a) alleges, expressly or by implication, that any persons lawfully married are not truly and sufficiently married;
LikeLike