Elitist’s views on immigration not shared by man in street

We have all heard the Hollywood hype merchants and left wing opinionists who flood our media talking down to us and lecturing us on how if we don’t accept illegal immigration we’re uncivilised xenophobes living on the fringes of society. Just as in the US where border crossings are encouraged, televison and radio in Australia is soaked with Progressive loons who advocate boats of illegals should be encouraged to flood Australia’s northern coastline.

Well, I’ve yet to see a survey on the issue in NZ or Australia that is as encompassing as a recent Rasmussen poll in the US, but it wouldn’t surprise me if the results were similar. A new national telephone survey finds that 62% believe the government is not aggressive enough in deporting illegal immigrants. This is a 10% increase since last year.

32% believe illegal immigrants who have American-born children should be exempt from deportation, an element of Obama’s plan, but 51% now disagree, a figure also up by 10% on last year.

An overwhelming 83% of voters think someone should be required to prove they are legally allowed in the United States before receiving local, state or federal government services. Just 12% disagree.

These figures show the climate is changing on immigration, that people are waking up to how they have been conned by the govt, and they don’t like it. We’re not isolated xenophobes, we’re mainstream. How much longer will out of touch Western elitists in beltway districts, the bureaucracy, Hollywood and the mainstream media keep trying to push this clearly unpopular social change upon us, and use a complete reversal of reality as a means to do it?

6 thoughts on “Elitist’s views on immigration not shared by man in street

  1. Maybe we should be proactive and start asking our politicians some awkward questions about whether or not they approve of the alteration to our society through immigration that has not been agreed to by the citizens of the country. Maybe we should also be questioning them about the blind adoption of UN treaties without taking them to the polls.

    They have truly become our rulers and not our representatives.


  2. “They have truly become our rulers and not our representatives.”

    Excellent phrase mawm.We badly need to reverse this political atrocity but these statist scum guard their power so closely.


  3. It’s not immigration, it’s an invasion dammitt


    “The blood is streaming from my mouth, the back of my head and the other wounds. My lip is split in two, all the way up to the nose. … I do not understand.. I am left with a lot of questions. Why? Why us? What is the meaning of this extreme violence? What is happening in the head of those immigrants, when they thrash a couple that is on their way home from Christmas Eve? I am filled with hate, frustration, and sadness. I do not want them in my neighbourhood, my city, or my country.”

    If you don’t want this sort of garbage in NZ you should just shut-up you racist-racism-xenophobe


  4. Eventually, after reading enough literature, studying closely the mean, methods and motives of the likes of the Frankfurt School, Fabian Society, you eventually come to the conclusion that what is going is no accident. As you pointed out in your post about falling marriage rates, this has been decades in the planning. Any beginner to this area, I always start them off with George Orwell, in particular 1984 and Animal Farm.

    “Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know what no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.” – George Orwell 1984


Comments are closed.