Rod Drury exposes awful arrogance and elitism of Flag Change Panel

Rod DruryIf you believe John Key’s Flag Change Panel is anything but another cynical self serving exercise in propaganda and manipulation of public opinion by our champagne communist Prime Minister then you need to think again. An exchange with panel member Rod Drury on Twitter proves just what a cynical farce the whole process is.

A fellow conservative (Sarah) known for her persistent courage and candour, asked Panel Member Drury to reply to a simple question she had asked some time ago about how many people had attended govt funded propaganda based roadshows in Ashburton, Wanaka, and Queenstown.

This was after Drury had uttered a statement urging NZers to”get into” the flag change process, an approach that would seem to blatantly contravene the “no presumption of change” policy that was highlighted in the policy document on the flag change referenda. NZ citizens should not be encouraged or compelled to enter into a process they perceive to be dishonest, cynical, wasteful and unnecessary.

Drury’s arrogant and forceful response to Sarah’s polite question lead off with the phrase “I don’t know who you are”, and he followed on with the instruction that Sarah must get involved and “use the opportunity”. This is a view that seems to exist in deliberate ignorance of the fact that the greater majority of NZers do not see the flag change process as any “opportunity” but rather as something they would prefer was not happening.

Sarah’s quite correct response to Drury’s rude response was “I am a Conservative, who are you?”.

Drury’s immediate response was “given your tone I’m not inclined to engage. Process is underway. Use it or loose it. Be rude I block”

To me this exhibited such a degree of arrogance and self righteous humbug I was appalled. Sarah had been nothing but polite. It was Drury who had been rude in questioning Sarah’s status and her right to question him. Also inherent in the statement was the implication that those who disagreed with the existence of the panel and its mission were below Mr Drury’s position, and that any such disagreement would automatically be classified as “rude”.  A view that I think is just the most self serving arrogant hogwash.

Sarah patiently responded “I asked a genuine question that was not rude. Why can’t panelist’s answer it?”

Once again Drury’s response was arrogant, patronising and unhelpful “I’m not sure but Chch was disappointingly low. Regardless process is committed so draw and flag and/or vote”

After being cc’d into the conversation I submitted my first 128 character limited message in response to Sarah- “Yes, seems that Mr. Drury is a tad sensitive. Comes with trying to railroad NZers into something they don’t want?”

Drury’s response was once again arrogant and patronising- “I’m clearly not. Though you have no problems hurling. Process started. Moan from the side or be part of it. Choose”

Note the reference to “hurling” which I thought given Mr Drury’s earlier sensitivity could only be a reference to what he would like to characterise as “abuse”.

Isn’t it typical how Progressives have gradually advanced with their anti-abuse strategy to the point where any challenge to prevailing socialist wisdom is so categorised and therefore becomes unfit to respond to? Thereby giving the neo-commies a convenient out from questions that are too hard for their precious easily hurt sensibilities.

My own response to Drury’s statement was “Hurling?? Good grief, can’t you progs ever respond to criticism other than by falsely categorising it as “abuse”?

Whereupon Drury instantly blocked me. So typical of no argument cowardly progressives everywhere who have only one response to any honest challenge to their assumed elitism or social superiority and that is to classify the challenger as a non-person and therefore unworthy of further exchange. A strategy that has typified one party state communist regimes throughout history.

This approach underpins the whole elitist flag change process, where self appointed proponents are determined to proceed with their insulting and wasteful agenda and pretend that those objecting are beneath contempt.

Drury’s response also suggests that the other meetings were as poorly attended as the one we know about, being the primary meeting in Christchurch where the 12 flag panel members outnumbered the ten members of the public.

However I think the telling point in the exchange outlined above is Mr Drury’s contempt for dissent, and that this typifies the whole process. Ordinary NZers are being rail-roaded by John Key and his cowardly Nat Party colleagues and a panel of elitist progressives into a process they do not want and do not want to pay for.

And those who object have every right. If John Key wants to enter into a personal mission to change NZ’s flag he should so it in his own time and at his own expense and not abuse the office of Prime Minster and the NZ taxpayer in the arrogant manner he is guilty of right now.

As for Mr. Drury he needs to show a lot more respect to the NZ citizens who are (mostly unwillingly) paying him his day rate.



Categories: Culture, NZ Politics

Tags:

5 replies

  1. A panel of high-profile New Zealanders charged with selecting a shortlist of new flag designs will each pocket $640 a day – some up to $850 a day

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11413938

    This Mr Drury sounds like quite the character…..Yeah right

    I went to the blokes twitter account. The news feed is all over the show with that much random stuff on it. The conversation can be found here …

    “The quality of flag design has stepped up in the past week
    https://www.govt.nz/browse/engaging-with-government/the-nz-flag-your-chance-to-decide/gallery/ … #nzflag
    First country to do an open process. Get into it” Rod Drury

    If you follow the link it goes to a Government page with an introduction that says it all…

    “The current flag (the 1902 New Zealand Blue Ensign) will not be published to our gallery as it will automatically be included in referendum two in March 2016.”

    I don’t have a twitter account and I’m a hell of a lot less polite than Sarah, so I say to you Mr Drury you stooge how about you go try sticking your head up your own ass you dog

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Drury like Morgan become special once they have multi millions and I have been surprised how these guys behave because years ago people like them would have been conservative and humble .
    Drury wants councils to spend on social projects locally ,of course funded by ratepayers, instead of telling the councils to stick to their knitting.
    The flag panel should all resign and tell Key they are not doing his dirty work.

    Like

  3. We shouldn’t be pushed around by ISIS terrorists. The fact is the government has been working towards the flag change for years, if not decades; it’s going to be the silver fern on a black field; Key should (once again) just have manned up and made the hard decision, changed the damn flag, and got on with the real work of government — getting rid of benefits welfare leftism unionism and bludgerism.

    Like

  4. Would it be time to use OIA requests to get numbers on the turnouts at these flag change events?

    Although I admit I quite like the Kiwi with laser beams, and will be voting for it if it comes to the crunch. /sarc

    Like

  5. Re: Sarah’s quite correct response to Drury’s rude response was “I am a Conservative, who are you?”.

    Yes, just who is Rod Drury?

    Like

This is not a forum for the left, so if you're a commie please go elsewhere. New commenters automatically moderated until cleared.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s