Sarah Palin’s Alaska Changed To Appease Anti-Hunting Protestors

This is an extremely short joke video, but it has a powerful impact upon one’s perception of the left. If you think they are merely a benign misguided force of under educated highly brainwashed loons and losers, you might modify that opinion after watching this video. You might even start thinking of them as evil.

4 thoughts on “Sarah Palin’s Alaska Changed To Appease Anti-Hunting Protestors

  1. Once again we see the Left equating killing an animal to killing a unborn human infant.

    Their hypocrisy is stark when you realise that it is the Progressive Left who are the most vocal supporters of abortion. And assuming not all Leftists are vegetarian and that they do in fact eat meat in the most part, where exactly do they think meat comes from? – a meat tree? Or maybe some lab technician grows it artificially in the lab?

    I really HATE the duplicitous lying smearing self-righteous Progressive Left!!!

    Like

  2. The difference between a fetus and an animal is an animal is alive and aware and conscious, wants to live just like you. A fetus knows nothing, in unaware unconcious, does not suffer……. what is so difficult about that for you to understand Kris K.
    And hunting / anti-hunting does not follow political lines as much as you wish it did.
    It’s more likely to follow a compassion versus / sadist lines.

    I am a vegetarian btw. The main thing that bugs rational thinking individual about hunters is they hunt and kill for pleasure…. I don’t care how much the sing it’s about food it’s not. It’s about the joy of killing…

    No supporter of the right to abortion thinks abortion is a good thing, just an acceptable end to an unwanted and unfortunate pregnacy. No one has a right to
    force any woman to carry a parasite inside her body. When that fetus becomes self
    sustaining it then has it’s own rights… then it has the capacity to suffer. What we are about is ending suffering.

    Like

  3. Jim H. January 10, 2011 at 06:28,

    The difference between a fetus and an animal is an animal is alive and aware and conscious, wants to live just like you. A fetus knows nothing, in unaware unconcious, does not suffer……. what is so difficult about that for you to understand Kris K.

    I take it you’ve never watched a video of an abortion? – the unborn child doesn’t exactly cuddle up to the scalpel. And if we accept that the unborn child is alive, in any meaningful sense of the word, then I guess on the same basis as you regard being “unaware” and “unconcious” as acceptable qualificfations for killing something/someone you would have no qualms about killing someone in their sleep?

    And hunting / anti-hunting does not follow political lines as much as you wish it did.

    Except in the above case where Leftist media are painting Palin as a gun totting lunatic who enjoys killing animals as much as she would an unborn child.

    It’s more likely to follow a compassion versus / sadist lines.
    I am a vegetarian btw. The main thing that bugs rational thinking individual about hunters is they hunt and kill for pleasure…. I don’t care how much the sing it’s about food it’s not. It’s about the joy of killing…

    Having hunted and known hunters, hunters don’t kill for the pleasure of killing anymore than someone who works at an abattoir enjoys killing – or for that matter as does someone who buys meat at their local butchers. And I love the implied smear that all hunters are irrational. Being a vegetarian no doubt you also hold all meat eaters as irrational, too.

    No supporter of the right to abortion thinks abortion is a good thing, just an acceptable end to an unwanted and unfortunate pregnacy. No one has a right to force any woman to carry a parasite inside her body. When that fetus becomes self sustaining it then has it’s own rights… then it has the capacity to suffer. What we are about is ending suffering.

    Oh, and here I was thinking all abortionists were in it simply for the joy of killing (to use your hunter analogy). And I just love how you Leftists like to assign words to things to ‘help’ you strengthen [sic] your arguments – words like “parasite”, “unwanted”, “unfortunate” and “self sustaining”. When does a human being ever become self sustaining? Certainly not until at least the age of three years (probably much later, but lets assume this age). So you would no doubt see no problem with murdering a three year old on the basis that it’s not “self sustaining”? Are you also an advocate of euthanasia? – some of those old folks aren’t very “self sustaining” either.

    And being a typical Leftist I notice your complete lack of concern over any smear in the above advert being directed at Sarah Palin – for instance, that she’s a (unborn) baby killer – especially when she is pro-life. You come over all self righteous, but when it all boils down we know the Left have no morals or standards – it’s all just a convenient front which you wheel out when it suits.

    Like

  4. Red, would you please allow the above comment of Jim H to stand – it highlights the (lack of) reasoning and (lack of) morality of those on the Left, not to mention their not applying any standards to one of their own; in this case the Leftist media.

    Like

Comments are closed.