“Bipartisan” seating arrangements a ruse the Republicans need to wake up to

I was irritated to read of the proposal for “bipartisan” seating arrangements during Obama’s State of The Union speech. The idea, put forward by Democrat Mark Udal, is for Representatives to be mingled rather than sit on each side of the auditorium. To show the country that the two parties are working together for the good of the nation. This is manifest nonsense and the Republicans who have led in agreeing to participate, some of them so enthusiastically, need to be recognised as RINOS and marked down for future expulsion from the Party.

They’re the usual suspects. Slimy John McCain who has done nothing but gush over Obama since his Arizona re-election. The fake Republican Lisa Murkowski, who was elected by Alaskan Democrats. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins were panting to sign up. The traitors who have been poisoning the true intent of the Republicans for so long.

When is the Republican party going to wake up and stop being such incredibly easy meat for the left? Firstly, the premise of this move is completely wrong. To agree to the proposal means you agree with the premise, and that premise is the lie that the Democrats spread so wide after the Arizona shootings, when they claimed that event was the inevitable outcome of increasingly “heated rhetoric” coming from the “far right”.

Secondly, the real meaning of bipartisanship is compromise and I say here that no rational man who claims to believe in one thing can sign on to compromise with a second man whose stated objective is to destroy everything the first man stands for. I refer to a wonderfully accurate piece of prose from a posting on Crusader Rabbit yesterday-

‘The Left is more than ruthless, they are evil. They seek to rule, not by persuasion or honest debate, but by any means necessary. They revel in slander, character assassination and violence. They are steeped in hatred for all who oppose them. They seek to create and hold a monopoly on news media and editorial opinion; they support voter fraud and stolen elections; they prosecute political opponents on trumped-up charges in kangaroo courts. They have raised “the politics of personal destruction” to a high art form. Fairness, civility and common decency are unknown to them. I do not see the American Left as fellow citizens, I see them as sworn enemies for whom I feel little or no commonality or fraternity.’ (originally from Saber Point.)

Never a damn truer word was spoken, and what kind of man is it who can bring himself to compromise with such evil??? There is no room for bipartisanship in the government of America when one party stands for the Constitution and the other wants to destroy it. And if there are Republicans who do want to compromise, then they have no damn place in the Republican Party.

The Republicans need to reject this proposal and use said rejection to send the strong and unequivocal message to the left that they should have sent years ago. That message being-

We will have no truck with today’s un-American Democrat Party. There is a second part to the message. That part is we reject the premise of your calls for “bipartisanship”, and we reject the propaganda that underpins it. Not only now, but for every time in the future that you attempt to use such propaganda. Our objective is to destroy your party and restore every breach of the Constitution that has occurred over the last 150 years and we will never ever again allow such a cancer to grow within our Free Republic.

This is America, and we came here to escape Europe, and we will not allow you today to redefine our Republic into the very state we rejected with the blood and sacrifice of our forefathers during the War of Independence.

You sit there, we will sit here. You fight for your objective, and we will fight for ours. Today, with our Constitutional Republic under threat like never before, we reject your bipartisanship on the grounds that it is underpinned by lies and deceit, and that your objectives are far beyond the bounds of any compromise. We patriots do not want to sit amongst you, but even more strongly desire that you traitors should not sit amongst us.

The Republicans will not say this of course. Not today, but I believe that as a result of pressure from the Tea Party, the day they will is ever drawing closer.

10 thoughts on ““Bipartisan” seating arrangements a ruse the Republicans need to wake up to

  1. It’s a ruse. It’s the first real effort to try to unify all points of view, to outright efface the party lines, and to make one party. We don’t wnat that because we know that where it’s been done before, it led to lethal consequences. Besides, I think we are agreed as to what the ringleaders behind this look like.

    Going further, you may want to read this RB. I do not want civil discourse. I like the issue you raised better, but Mr. Surber lists out more reasons to go along with your own. He concludes with a coupla lines directed at “lefties,” but it is only the soft-headed libs he’s gonna upset. And that’s a good if maybe he wakes a few of them up with his tough love.

    I want the lefties to feel bad. I want them to feel hurt. I want them to cry to their mommies.

    That way the field will be cleared so we grown-ups can fix the nation and the economy. If you can’t put up with a little excrement, get the hell out of the barn.

    Here’s hoping that the distinction I’ve been trying to make starts to make sense to many more conservatives, and very soon. RB, the hard Left ain’t just gonna go home to their mommies.

    His conclusion better fits “liberals” in every Western Nation, than the hard Left. The latter do indeed have hardened thugs, not quite a Praetorian Guard yet , whom we have witnessed now and again. It is the hard Left and their Statist money men who’ve been stealing their advances by hiding behind those girly-man idiot libs all these last decades. You and I know that there is real trouble brewing when the Left is acting like they no longer need those useful idiots to get the rest of what they crave.

    Anyway, they are apparently going for broke to enslave all of humanity. That is why our efforts are needed now, before the cut off communication, while we still can connect with each other.


  2. RB, unfortunately there still are a lot of Republicans who think like Scott Brown. One soft-headed “moderate” commenter charged me with moral equivalency on my screed Saturday exposing how the Left thinks references to murder are funny. I don’t know what will penetrate the thick skulls of voters who remain faithful to old line Republicans. The SKUNC acronym, or any other, is probably not going to take with these unthinking Rbots. At least not until they get their thinking straightened out by hearing more thoughts that have been provoked from bloggers who write as well as you and KG. Only hearing more of what we’re saying maybe will break their self-inflicted blindness.

    I currently don’t know what else to tell this sort of dingbat.


  3. People keep saying Scott Brown is the best we could expect out of Massachusetts and that we should be happy for small mercies. The trouble with that approach is that it is a self fulfilling prophesy, whereby Massachusetts becomes wanting in expressions of ideas that challenge the status quo.

    If people do not hear the ideas, they will not think about them, and if they don’t think about them, they will never vote for them. We really need strong articulate believers to stand against charlatans like Brown. We will eventually win because we have better ideas.

    The left only win when they succeed in suppressing or misrepresenting our ideas. Scott Brown aids them in this objective. A real Conservative would confront and eventually defeat them.


Comments are closed.