General Debate 11/02/11

American Spectator straw poll:
Current results:
Palin 60.17%
Cain 5.38%
Christie* 4.03%
Daniels 4.03%
Ron Paul 3.87%
Demint* 3.19%
Gingrich 2.35%
Pawlenty 2.35%
Romney 1.85%
Bachmann 1.51%
Barbour 1.34%
Huckabee 1.34%
Ryan* 1.34%
Rubio 1.18%
Pence* 0.84%
Santorum 0.67%
Rand Paul 0.50%
Perry* 0.50%
Thune 0.34%
Johnson 0.34%
Other 2.86%

*already announced they are not running in 2012

More from the Obama believe it or not file.

An attorney who has aggressively pursued the release of President Obama’s Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate filed a complaint in federal court yesterday to force the release of Obama’s Social Security files. “I’m not asking for Obama’s Social Security number,” Attorney Orly Taitz told WND, acknowledging that the Social Security Administration will not release the number of a living person. “I want related information, including information about deceased individuals that will help us prove whether or not Obama has committed Social Security fraud.”

Taitz filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to force the Social Security Administration to respond to her Freedom of Information Act request seeking information on Obama’s Social Security number. At the heart of Taitz’s complaint to the court is the suspicion that Obama has engaged in Social Security fraud by using a number initially issued to another person.

Taitz contends the Social Security number Obama has used the most often since around 1980 was, according to Lexis Nexis and Choice Point, initially assigned to an elderly individual born in 1890 who resided in Connecticut. In her complaint, Taitz claims that Obama is linked in national databases to some 39 different Social Security numbers, including one allegedly issued in1976 or 1977 to a person born in 1890 who was living in Connecticut at the time of the Social Security application.

To buttress her arguments, Taitz submitted to the federal court affidavits signed by private investigators Susan Daniels and John Sampson. Both Daniels and Sampson state that in the 1980s, Obama assumed as his own a Social Security number that had been applied for in Connecticut and was issued by the Social Security Administration between the years 1976 and 1977.

Sampson, a retired senior investigator with the Department of Homeland Security, provided in his affidavit an expert opinion that there is no reasonable explanation for a person residing in Hawaii to get a Social Security number issued in Connecticut.

“The affidavits of the private investigators indicates Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number,” she said, “so I am requesting information from the Social Security Administration that would help us track down the Connecticut-issued number Obama is using as well as the multiple Social Security numbers that show up for Obama in the private investigator databases.”

Barack Obama Sr. lived in Hawaii from 1959 until June 1962, when he moved to Massachusetts to attend Harvard University; nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Barack Obama Sr. ever had a Connecticut address.

All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.” In some cases, the middle initial “H” is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: “Barac,” “Barak,” and “Barrack” Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.


9 thoughts on “General Debate 11/02/11

  1. Man, if these allegations regarding Obama’s foreign birth, multiple social security numbers , linking to Muslim brotherhood, etc, etc, then that must be the biggest coverups ever committed in the history of politics in the US.

    Good work there Red. Keep writing or bringing up these issues/topics because they’re interesting.


  2. Yeah, good stuff Red.
    The more that comes to light regarding this “pretender to the throne”, the more we see just how corrupt and unprincipled both he and those who have put him into power are.
    Keep it up.


  3. Sorry to hear that, Angus. Of course we all know that the Left want no Conservative Rightwing voice to bring light and balance to their evil agenda – so no surprise really.
    Not to worry, though, your reward will be in heaven 😉


  4. @Angus, I’ve been banned at RA on 3 of the 4 computers I use regularly… And I even go out of my way to make my posts as language neutral as possible, doesn’t matter, braindead Colonial Viper and A1lens can post the most vitriolic insults about the right with no consequences but as a right winger even mention that can be construed as critical of minorities and out comes the stick…


  5. Which is why Crusader Rabbit will give those bastards no voice. No way. Not ever. And then they have the nerve to whinge about “free speech”!


  6. This is the left. They lie constantly. They say they revere free speech but they do not. They do not and their claim is an utter lie. Leftists are always liars. The one personal characteristic you will always see in leftists is their utter nonchalance for the truth.


Comments are closed.