A gang of what I call fake Maoris, racists and opportunists is getting together to prepare a plan for Constitutional reform. The gang is lead by Margeret Mutu, a NZer of Scottish / English descent who self identifies as Maori and who demonstrated, during events that recently gave her undue public exposure, that she is somebody who should never be seen within a light year of any country’s Constitution.
The Marxist academics at the blog Kiwipolitico describe Mutu thus-
Margaret Mutu is a racial polemicist who received her professorship as a PC sinecure from an Auckland University administration concerned about placating key constituent groups. She is a second rate rate academic with a third rate publication record espousing fourth rate post-dependency and post-modern subaltern-focused theories. She publishes in obscure journals, mostly without peer review, and in crony academic volumes. Her books are published by local presses and receive no international mention.
Given that the fallout when Marxists disagree is always exceptionally vindictive, this is still a damning indictment of someone who has the PM’s blessing to prepare guidelines for a constitutional review. The NZCPR has a post up called “Leave Our Constitution Alone“. Excerpt-
A Maori academic who says that immigration by whites should be restricted because they pose a threat to race relations due to their “white supremacist” attitudes, is leading an Independent Maori Working Group on constitutional reform. According to Iwi Chairs Forum member Margaret Mutu the group will develop a constitution to be given to the Crown as a model for New Zealand. She claims that their working party has the blessing of not only the Maori Party leader Pita Sharples, but also National Party leader and Prime Minister John Key.
The mainstream media fawns over Key because he fits the mould of an easily manipulated socialist would-be-if-he-could-be. A man with no political principles who can be nudged in any direction the left wish by means of a few well placed newspaper or television stories. Key’s major concern is his personal popularity, and true to his boyhood obsession, clinging to his job as Prime Minister.
He’s no Winston Churchill, who was possessed of courage, and powerful oratory skills that he used to persuade the electorate to follow him down difficult roads. Key just drifts along with public opinion, and public opinion is primarily moulded in this country by left wing academics and their mainstream media acolytes.
That is why John Key gives his blessing to odious assaults on NZ’s constitutional framework. A man with courage and prepared to stand by the National Party’s founding principles would never ever commit such an act of outrageous compromise. John Key is a disaster for the National Party, but with his abject willingness to embrace separatism and racist cronyism he is a bigger disaster for New Zealand. Carelessly selling our culture and western traditions out to a strident self serving minority who should be ignored.
(Hat tip to KG)