
Whereas the Labour party bears the greatest part of the blame for New Zealand’s decline into a lawless degenerate backwater, it is an unwelcome truth that the National Party has over time made its own generous contribution to this unfortunate outcome. Citizens are aware of the failure of the Nats. Even with such a disastrous […]

” Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant. Then it tries to silence good.” – Charles J. Chaput Jacinda Ardern portrays herself as a defender of democracy. This is a sham. Everything she learnt at the International Union of Socialist Youth was aimed at slowly extinguishing all other political viewpoints other than her own. How […]

Of course Ardern is most to blame. Followed by the vile propagandists who pose as our mainstream media. That said, the resistance to Labour’s Three (5) Waters bill from National and Act has been as weak as the liquid the legislation targets. The reality the legacy media will not reveal is that Jacinda Ardern and […]
That’s me making Mencken and Lenin correct simultaneously.
LikeLike
Perfect. š
LikeLike
Ron Paul In la-la land http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65035.html
LikeLike
erikter, Ron Paul is a nut. Maybe that’s why the Statist media covered his comments. But broadcasting the words coming out of the mouth of a nut, it discredits the comments. Few people will recall that a broken clock is right twice a day and think his utterance more foolishness.
The Buma should indeed have gone to court and gotten a court review months before his actions here. It’s not like this was a life and death instant need for force. That’s only one argument about why the Buma’s actions are dangerous and I don’t want to hijack this thread further. There is not a dissenter in the world they could not summarily outlaw and then offed in this manner. That includes you and me. When RB wants to open it up for discussion, I will.
LikeLike
Good article on what’s wrong with the Wall Street protesters. Headline linked by Drudge the other day.
Ron Paul’s right on the terrible precedent of the US government killing its own citizen. That the precedent set is in the case of an almost certain terrorist and conspirator in the killing of other Americans merely shows how wrong it is. IOW, it’s the only type of example they would dare set such a precedent with.
Because once precedents are set, it becomes easier to do that which was even-more-unthinkable before…
Pointing out what a scumbag this Awlaki is is not an argument against Ron Paul’s point about this indeed being a very bad step that has been taken.
Just a thought: Can the US government revoke the citizenship of someone? Would need someone with expertise to answer this. But if it *were* possible, then every dirtbag terrorist like this guy could simply be declared a non-US citizen and then killed like any other terrorist. And no problem there.
LikeLike
LDW. It’s been done in American fiction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Without_a_Country
Also, this alwaki cretin who was offed would not even be a citizen if the meaning of the 14th Amendment had not been Leftistly altered by the courts late in the 19th century and allowed to stand since.
LikeLike