A friend of mine drew my attention to this video, as he thought it exampled so well how empty of meaning the National Party has become and why they have been capable of no other course of action for the last fourty years but that of surrender to the left.
Would Sid Holland ever have produced such vacuous rubbish?
Categories: NZ Politics
White males need to get angry- don’t vote for the status quo 
Onetime Australian Labor leader less left wing than National Party 
The National party’s thought police 
Trump calls left’s bluff, and they have no cards 
The only bill a National govt should be debating about RadioNZ, TVNZ etc is to close the lot down – and hand the frequencies over gratis to Fox News.;
Free media in a free society support freedom.
Communist media in a communist society support communism.
It really is that simple: it is ALWAYS that simple.
LikeLike
Years ago I noted how National ministers used to refer to the Party as a broad range consensus party. In other words “stand for anything mean nothing.” Nothing is new about the Nats today, just the same old same old. Never voted for them and never will. (Same goes for Labour though.)
LikeLike
Which part of this don’t you understand:
To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.
Labour is Bolshevik.
National, for all its faults, is Menshevik.
The Greens, of course, are the Trots.
LikeLike
I gather a wealthy Muslim has bought into Fox news so you can kiss that good-bye eventually.
LikeLike
Not until you prise my internet from my cold, dead, hands!
LikeLike