It always stuck me as strange that during the 2008 election, John McCain’s team never raised the issue of Obama’s Birth Certificate. Why didn’t they reject the obvious diversion of the COLB and demand that Obama prove beyond doubt that he was eligible to be POTUS? Especially when the Democrats had demanded that very thing of McCain, and Obama was part of the group that pursued the issue. Now there’s another strange event that unexpectedly ties into the above.
An entry was posted on Wikipedia about Colonel Larkin, who is undergoing court martial for refusing to deploy to the Afghanistan battle front. Larkin regards his Commander in Chief (Obama) as ineligible to hold the position and wants to force Obama to provide his actual Birth Certificate (presently stored secretly in Hawaii). There were objections to the article being posted on Wikipedia and it was deleted in rapid time. Who was behind the scrubbing? Eventually, the deleter was discovered to be a lawyer who played a lead part in McCain’s election campaign.
Why would a McCain camp lawyer be so keen to keep the Larkin story under wraps? The same lawyer who apparently directed the strategy to spike the Obama BC story during the election campaign. What on earth would provoke this lawyer to take such an avid interest in downplaying the issue of Obama’s BC?
I don’t have the answers. Many people do believe though that McCain was deliberately chosen to oppose Obama because it was known he would lose. Chosen by whom? I don’t know, just like I do not know why McCain’s boys would be frantically trying to cover up an issue that could be extremely damaging to Obama’s presidency. So far, there’s no evidence of any Soros connection.