Jane Luskin was the craven cultural Marxist who interrogated NZ citizen Louis Crimp on TV3 concerning his recent attempts to criticise the “Maorification of NZ by the revolving door Labour and National governments.
Crimp is not all that articulate, or though if you listen hard, amongst all the prejudicial cutting of the interview by the Progressive propagandists who call themselves reporters and run that dirty little viper’s nest of Marxists called the TV3 newsroom, he doesn’t do too bad.
In the entirely fantastic event that I would have been interviewed by the nauseatingly wet liberal Luskin, here’s how I would have responded to her lame and predictable remarks and questions-
Luskin- (speaking of the haka and the Maori World Cup opening Ceremony)
“(it’s) Highly symbolic of something that generates a lot of pride among NZers.
You only need to look at the response to the rugby world cup and the opening ceremony and say that it got praise from around the world including Kiwis living overseas, you sorta can’t argue with that.”
“Well you can argue with that and I will if that’s OK you horrible little fascist anti-free speech PC Marxist. Even if I agree with the premise of your question (which I don’t) since when was this a country where it is forbidden to hold unfashionable viewpoints?
You have no evidence to support your claim that the ceremony was supported by the majority of NZers. Why don’t you hold a referendum on your program and test that assertion?”
Crimp then went on to say that even though Maori were only 15% of the general population, they made up 52% of the jail population.
“Don’t you have to look at the causes behind that?”
“The causes are obvious to anyone who is not a PC liberal like you Jane, and they’re that Maori commit an inordinate amount of crime compared to the rest of the NZ population. Why are you so anxious to conceal that truth?”
They then discussed government funding of the development of Maori language, with Crimp objecting to the amount of money being spent on this project. This really upset Luskin-
“Its an offical language of NZ. But it was the first language spoken in NZ so why would you object? The original inhabitants weren’t the British.”
“I don’t care a damn if its official, or was proclaimed to be so by some gutless pandering politician somewhere. If I don’t approve of taxpayer money being spent on this damn farce I will say so and I don’t care a jot that its an offical language or not, given I don’t agree with that proclamation anyway.
Furthermore the language that is being pushed today as “Maori” was not necessarily the “first language spoken in NZ”. There is no way you can know if that is true. Given the uncertainty over previous settlements, the first language spoken in NZ could have been any language. Another thing- the language spoken back then probably bears little resemblance to what “Maori” claim as their language today.
So what if the first inhabitants were not the British, English is the world language and the language of commerce, and if there is any money to be spent on teaching people a language it should be spent on English given that standards are so atrocious in schools today.”
Crimp said (in response to Luskins statement concerning the British being the first inhabitants) that at the time, “there were only a few savages around”.
“Is that how you see people now as savages?”
“That’s not what I said. Please do not try and put words in my mouth. I said they were savages then, and this is a claim born out by many reports of cannibalism and tribal conflict from those days. It comes back to the core of my original objection. Why highlight and use a ritual that harks back to those savage days to open the Rugby World Cup?”
“Do you understand why some people find this extremely offensive?”
“I’m not the least bit worried about “offending” people. I speak what I believe to be the truth and if some are offended by that then too bad. It is better that people are encouraged to speak truth rather than hide it because somebody somewhere may be “offended”. This is a policy that would lead to a country being awash in lies, just as NZ is today.
Now get out of my face you disgusting pandering Marxist sycophant.”
BTW, what did Luskin say to Crimp that prompted him to ask the question about sex against a tree? I notice this did not make the air. C’mon Jane, tell us what you said.