11 thoughts on “The chart the CO2 alarmists don’t want you to see”
If the answer to a problem is to TAX it then you know it is a con.
Look at Alcohol and Tobacco.
Billions of dollars in TAX and no change in smoking or drinking habits.
Has anybody noticed that despite the millions spent on stop smoking programs they never publish targets, or rates of smoking etc Zero accountability. The best product to help wean people off smoking, e cigarettes or vaping, is seen as a threat to not only big Tobacco but also Government revenue.
That is because it is a failed policy, much like road policing is to stop road accidents.
A huge success if it is about the money. And it is a huge success.
The Tax on Alcohol and Tobacco is pretty much an economists dream. its not about stopping people from drinking or smoking, its about making the users pay for the police and health services etc
I don’t know exactly. I got it off Twitter. I tried to find it outside of Twitter but failed. There are URLs relating to the data at the top of the graph.
The weather man struggles sometimes to predict tomorrows weather.
And these dam brains-trust-pseudo-scientists say they know the weather forecast years from now?
Also CO2 levels in the bloody Cambrian period (half a billion years ago) have to be looked at in the context of the earth being a completely different place. http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=77
These may serve the purpose adequately:
Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels for the last 500 million years Daniel H. Rothman PNAS 2002 April, 99 (7) 4167-4171. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022055499
This should also be quite useful:
Lloyd PJ. AN ESTIMATE OF THE CENTENNIAL VARIABILITY OF GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. Energy & Environment · Vol. 26, No. 3, 2015
ABSTRACT
There has been widespread investigation of the drivers of changes in global temperatures. However, there has been remarkably little consideration of the magnitude of the changes to be expected over a period of a few decades or even a century. To address this question, the Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined. The differences in temperatures between all records which are approximately a century apart were determined, after any trends in the data had been removed. The differences were close to normally distributed. The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27C. This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse gases [standard ideological requirement for articles of this nature], there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was due to natural variations.
If the answer to a problem is to TAX it then you know it is a con.
Look at Alcohol and Tobacco.
Billions of dollars in TAX and no change in smoking or drinking habits.
Has anybody noticed that despite the millions spent on stop smoking programs they never publish targets, or rates of smoking etc Zero accountability. The best product to help wean people off smoking, e cigarettes or vaping, is seen as a threat to not only big Tobacco but also Government revenue.
That is because it is a failed policy, much like road policing is to stop road accidents.
A huge success if it is about the money. And it is a huge success.
LikeLike
The Tax on Alcohol and Tobacco is pretty much an economists dream. its not about stopping people from drinking or smoking, its about making the users pay for the police and health services etc
LikeLike
Where does this graph come from? Like the sea level one this needs to be published everywhere but needs authentication.
LikeLike
I don’t know exactly. I got it off Twitter. I tried to find it outside of Twitter but failed. There are URLs relating to the data at the top of the graph.
LikeLike
Now here’s a chart the commies really don’t want you to see:
what’s this to do with Global Warmist Communists? Should be obvious!
LikeLike
Pingback: So, CO2 Is Going To Kill Us ? - 'Nox & Friends
The weather man struggles sometimes to predict tomorrows weather.
And these dam brains-trust-pseudo-scientists say they know the weather forecast years from now?
LikeLike
Climate isn’t the weather. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/noaa-n/climate/climate_weather.html
Also CO2 levels in the bloody Cambrian period (half a billion years ago) have to be looked at in the context of the earth being a completely different place. http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=77
LikeLike
All them geniuses and none of them can invent, produce and market superior alternatives to fossil fuel.
What gives???
LikeLike
Where is the original reference for these data?
LikeLike
These may serve the purpose adequately:
Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels for the last 500 million years Daniel H. Rothman PNAS 2002 April, 99 (7) 4167-4171. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022055499
This should also be quite useful:
Lloyd PJ. AN ESTIMATE OF THE CENTENNIAL VARIABILITY OF GLOBAL TEMPERATURES. Energy & Environment · Vol. 26, No. 3, 2015
ABSTRACT
There has been widespread investigation of the drivers of changes in global temperatures. However, there has been remarkably little consideration of the magnitude of the changes to be expected over a period of a few decades or even a century. To address this question, the Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined. The differences in temperatures between all records which are approximately a century apart were determined, after any trends in the data had been removed. The differences were close to normally distributed. The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27C. This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse gases [standard ideological requirement for articles of this nature], there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was due to natural variations.
LikeLike